General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.

Author: Mirg Shakagul
Country: Brunei Darussalam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 17 April 2017
Pages: 123
PDF File Size: 8.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.15 Mb
ISBN: 331-3-41188-980-5
Downloads: 71887
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojat

First, its cross-sectional design means that significant correlations should not be confused with causal effects. Based on the findings of the original developers, Guarding, Resting and Asking for assistance were considered to be maladaptive strategies because they are more illness-focused, while the remaining five subscales were considered to be adaptive Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes in Italy and abroad.

The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: Impact of pain on self-rated health in community-dwelling older adults. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Distraction; Catastrophizing; Ignoring pain sensations; Distancing from pain; Coping self-statements; and Praying.

Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Prendere le distanze dal dolore 131415 Telephonefaxe-mail ti. The clinical and sociodemographic findings are largely consistent with those found by the original developers of the CSQ-Revised, being representative of subjects with chronic pain 67. Our internal consistency was satisfactory, thus confirming the extent to which the items assessed the same construct.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The Italian version was used, which has been shown to be reliable and valid Inan exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7. Our findings provide further evidence regarding the relationships between CSQ-Revised and CPCI, two widely used questionnaires that assess coping strategies in individuals with chronic pain.

  EL FLORISTA NILZA AMARAL PDF

The questionnaire was acceptable and easily understood, and could be self-administered in approximately 10 min. To identify any difficulties, inconsistencies or mistakes in translation, the committee explored the semantic, idiomatic and conceptual equivalence of the items and answers. Patients who had experienced recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded.

Cambridge University Press; Translation and cross-cultural adaptation This procedure was performed in accordance with international guidelines The authors thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments The authors thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of the manuscript. Spine Phila Pa ; Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. All of the questions were well accepted. Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Le persone sviluppano strategie per fronteggiare e gestire il dolore che sentono.

Scand J Behav Ther.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Robinson et al 7. The translation proved to have good factorial structure, and its psychometric properties are quesfionnaire to those of the original and other adapted versions. Browne MW, Cudeck R. The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome by means of careful wording.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Analyzing the psychometric properties of an outcome measure is a continuous process that is strongly recommended to strengthen its properties straregies expand its applicability to specific populations and contexts The patients were asked about any problems they encountered and all of the data were checked for missing or multiple responses.

The time needed to answer the questionnaire was recorded. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators.

No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Support Center Support Center. Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — Please review our privacy policy.

  ARINC 664 PDF

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Our findings also suggest that the CSQ-Revised and CPCI have different constructs, thus highlighting their distinctive contribution to multidisciplinary pain programs and confirming the intent of the original developers of the CPCI to create a questionnaire that investigated previously ignored coping strategies Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators.

The translators then reviewed the two Italian versions together, ensuring that items with poor wording were identified and improved by means of discussion. Testing Structural Equation Models. Although it had good reliability and validity, it showed an unstable structure 3 — 5 that has been hypothesized to be mainly due to difficulties in measuring differences in cognition between different clinical settings, disorders and pain problems 6.

This was an point rating scale ranging from 0 no pain at all to 10 the worst imaginable pain Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects.

Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. It was hypothesised a priori that the CSQ-Revised maladaptive strategies ie, Catastrophizing and Praying would be statistically significantly and positively related to a measure of pain intensity the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale 16a measure of disability the Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile — Roland scale 17and a measure of depression the Italian version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators.

A large sample item level factor analysis.